Solar design software in 2026: how to choose, and which tool fits your business
Solar design software takes a roof from satellite image to a priced proposal: it captures the roof, lays out panels and strings, simulates the yield and builds the document the customer signs. Which tool fits depends on how you sell. Teams that close with integrated financing lean to Aurora Solar, budget-first teams to the free OpenSolar, installers who quote on site from a tablet to Reonic, C&I engineers who need a lender-ready yield to HelioScope, and teams that want design, engineering, proposal and CRM in one product, across PV, batteries and heat pumps, to solarVis.
We make solarVis. It is one of the seven tools below, compared on the same criteria as the rest, and the tool profiles say where each of the others is the better choice.
Quick picks by business type
| If you are | Look first at | Because |
|---|---|---|
| A residential team that closes with financing inside the proposal | Design automation, bankable shade reports, cash, loan, lease and PPA options, permit-ready documentation (US) | |
| A small residential team where budget decides | The core platform is free, end to end, funded by hardware and finance partners | |
| An installer that quotes and closes on site from a phone or tablet | iOS and Android apps, heat pumps sized to a DIN EN 12831 heat load, e-signature on quotes, grid registration as a service (DE) | |
| A C&I engineering team that needs a lender-accepted yield | Within 1% of PVsyst by its own benchmark, recognised as bankable by Sunstone Credit, trackers on Enterprise | |
| An installer built around Enphase hardware that wants permit packages generated | Enphase's own design, proposal and permitting platform, with single- and three-line diagrams and automated permit packages (US) | |
| A residential installer that wants fast quotes inside the CRM it already runs | String checks against manufacturer specs, battery scenarios, and integrations with Pipedrive, Salesforce, Zoho and Odoo | |
| A team that wants design, engineering, proposal and CRM in one product, selling PV, batteries and heat pumps from homes to 50 MW sites | PV, battery and heat pump in one feasibility, automatic stringing with a single-line diagram, 26-page proposals with view tracking, a stage-gated CRM and tariff rules for 45+ countries |
What solar design software does
Every tool in this guide does the same four jobs, in the same order: capture the roof, lay out the system, estimate what it will produce and turn that into a proposal. Where they differ is how far past those four jobs they go, and for whom. Four kinds of product share the category:
- Residential sales design tools optimise for speed to a proposal a homeowner signs: automatic roof capture, a clean customer document, financing where the market expects it. Aurora Solar, Solargraf and Solar Monkey sit here.
- Commercial engineering tools optimise for accuracy an engineer or a lender will sign off: detailed electrical design, single-line diagrams, probabilistic yield. HelioScope is the reference.
- All-in-one sales platforms carry the design through to the pipeline, so the design, the proposal and the CRM share one record. Reonic, OpenSolar and solarVis are built this way.
- Free, partner-funded platforms trade a subscription for a business model paid for by hardware and finance partners. OpenSolar is the example.
The terms overlap in search. Solar design software and PV design software usually mean the design step; solar proposal software the document that closes; and solar sales software the whole path from lead to signature.
How to evaluate it: seven questions
Ask them in this order, because it is the order in which an installer's week runs into the tool. Each maps to one row group of the comparison matrix below.
1. Access: can you try it on your own project?
A demo shows the vendor's best project; a trial shows yours. Ask whether you can design a real roof before a sales call, what the trial includes, and whether the proposals it produces during the trial are usable.
2. Market fit: are your rules built in?
Payback depends on the tariff, the export rule and the paperwork. Ask whether your country's time-of-use schedules, net metering or net billing, and compliance documents are already in the tool, or typed in per project. In the UK that means MCS documents and Smart Export Guarantee rates; in South Africa, Eskom or municipal tariffs and SSEG rules.
3. Site and roof: how is the roof captured, and what happens when data runs out?
Ask how the roof is modelled (AI detection, LiDAR, drone photogrammetry, a DXF from a surveyor), what the tool does where aerial data does not cover the address, and whether it handles stepped roofs, extensions at a different height and several buildings on one site.
4. Layout and engineering: how much is automatic, and how big can it go?
Ask whether panels and strings are placed automatically and checked against the inverter, whether it produces single-line diagrams, and how large a system fits in one design. Capacity ceilings differ by an order of magnitude between tools.
5. Yield and feasibility: would a lender accept the number?
Ask how shading is simulated (per panel, per cell, hourly), whether batteries and heat pumps are modelled or only listed, what financial outputs you get, and whether any lender or laboratory has validated the yield.
6. Proposal and close: what does the customer see?
Ask how configurable the proposal is, whether you see when the customer opens it, and whether financing and signature live inside it or somewhere else.
7. Pipeline and operations: what happens after the proposal?
Ask whether there is a CRM or an integration to yours, whether the tool captures leads from your website, and whether it works on a phone or tablet on site.
The comparison matrix
"Not listed" means the vendor's public pages say nothing about a capability, not that the capability is absent.
| Capability | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Access | |||||||
| Try before a sales call | 7-day trial | Demos only | Free core platform | Book a demo | Free trial | Not listed | 14-day trial |
| Market fit | |||||||
| Markets served | Tariffs and regulations, 45+ countries | US-first; UK, DE, ES, FR | Users in 185+ countries | 13 markets, Germany first | 100+ countries (2021) | US, CA, BR, DE, AT, NL, JP | NL, BE, DE, ES, UK |
| UK MCS documents | Yes, MIS 3002 reports | Yes, since September 2026 | Yes | For heat pumps (MCS-ready) | Not listed | Not listed | Not listed |
| Site and roof modelling | |||||||
| Roof capture | AI roof detection, Fit to LiDAR | AI roof detection, LiDAR | Ada auto-design, LiDAR | Satellite, orthophoto and drone imagery | LiDAR-assisted (Pro) | AI roofline, obstruction and tree detection | Aerial photos, 3D elevation model |
| DXF or CAD | Import and export | Export | Export | Not listed | Export | Not listed | Not listed |
| Layout and engineering | |||||||
| Automatic stringing | Full Auto and Guided | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes, from site temperatures | Electrical design tool | String plan with spec checks |
| Single-line diagrams | Single-line, from the stringing; PDF and DXF | Yes | Nine countries, incl. UK, DE, IT, ES, FR | Residential; JPEG, PDF | Yes, to CAD | Single- and three-line | Not listed |
| Largest project per design | Up to 50 MW | Not listed | Not listed | Not listed | 30 MW DC (Enterprise) | Not listed | Not listed |
| C&I projects | Same product as homes | Via HelioScope | Yes | Not listed | Core focus | Flat roof and ground mount | Not listed |
| Yield and feasibility | |||||||
| Yield validation | No lender designation | Bankable shade reports | Not listed | Not listed | Bankable per Sunstone Credit | NREL-validated | Not listed |
| Battery modelling | Self-consumption, autonomy, arbitrage | Arbitrage (Premium) | Savings and peak-shaving schemes | Yes, dynamic prices | Storage design | Solar plus battery | Battery scenarios |
| Heat pumps | Sized, in one feasibility with PV and battery | Modelled for EU projects (limited release), not sized | Running costs (beta), not sized | Sized to a DIN EN 12831 heat load | Not listed | Not listed | In proposals |
| Proposal and close | |||||||
| Integrated financing | No, payment plan only | Cash, loan, lease, PPA | Integrated finance, CashFlow | Not listed | Not listed | TPO integrations (US) | Not listed |
| Permit packages | No | AHJ database (US) | SolarAPP+ (US) | Grid registration service (DE) | Not listed | Automated AHJ permits (US) | Not listed |
| Pipeline and operations | |||||||
| CRM | Built in, customizable pipelines | Integrates | Built in | Built in | Not listed | Integrates | Integrates (Pipedrive, Salesforce, Zoho, Odoo) |
| Website lead capture | Lead Generator, AI Sales Agent chat (add-ons) | Embedded Leads (US) | AI Lead Gen form (beta) | Energy House configurator; AI phone and WhatsApp intake | Not listed | Not listed | Not listed |
| Mobile | Browser-based | Not listed | Mobile app | iOS and Android | Not listed | Not listed | Browser-based |
Last verified 11 September 2026; the Aurora Solar, OpenSolar and Reonic columns re-checked on 29 September 2026. Every competitor cell comes from that vendor's own website, product pages, help centre or press releases. Re-checked every 90 days.
The tools, one by one
Aurora Solar
The US market leader, founded in San Francisco in 2013, used by more than 7,000 organizations with over 20 million projects designed. Its AI builds a 3D roof model in seconds, LiDAR sharpens it and bankable shade reports back it up; proposals carry US financing (cash, loan, lease, PPA) with e-signature, and a 25,000+ AHJ database feeds permit documents. Commercial engineering is sold separately, as HelioScope. Since 2025 it has built out in Europe, with regional sites for Germany, Spain and France and heat pump modelling for eligible installers in Germany, and in September 2026 it launched in the UK.
- Best for: residential teams that close with financing inside the proposal, mainly in the US.
- Watch for: demos only, no free trial; outside the US, tariffs are set up as custom rates.
- UK and South Africa: launched in the UK in September 2026 with MCS-compliant proposals; no South African presence is listed.
- Full comparison: Aurora Solar vs solarVis
OpenSolar
A free, end-to-end platform founded in Sydney in 2017, with 28,000+ active professionals in 185+ countries. Ada auto-designs systems, SolarTouch designs on mobile, and proposals carry integrated finance, e-signature and CashFlow payments. Since 16 April 2026 API Access, third-party Connectors and higher-resolution imagery are charged; hardware and finance partners fund the rest.
- Best for: residential teams where budget decides.
- Watch for: heat pump running costs are modelled, but the pump is sized in another tool; no chatbot on your own website.
- UK and South Africa: MCS support and UK single-line diagrams; strongest UK fit of the free options.
- Full comparison: OpenSolar vs solarVis
Reonic
A German all-in-one platform with offices in Berlin, Augsburg and São Paulo, reporting over 3,000 customers in 13 markets. It designs from satellite, orthophoto or drone imagery, strings automatically, draws residential single-line diagrams, sizes heat pumps against a DIN EN 12831 heat load, simulates EV demand and dynamic electricity prices, and ships iOS and Android apps with LiDAR room scanning. Its AI answers homeowners by phone and WhatsApp and reaches into the back office, and in Germany it sells grid registration and KfW applications as services.
- Best for: installers who quote on site from a phone or tablet and plan heat pumps in depth.
- Watch for: the way in is a booked demo; its deepest localisation is German.
- UK and South Africa: active in the UK, with a heat-load calculator and MCS-ready heating workflows; an English page for South Africa, with no local features listed.
- Full comparison: Reonic vs solarVis
HelioScope
Aurora's commercial design and simulation platform, built by Folsom Labs and acquired in 2021. It states its production model is within 1% of PVsyst, validated by DNV, NREL and the CEC, and in October 2025 Sunstone Credit recognised it as bankable. Tiers take systems up to 1.25, 5 and 30 MW DC; Enterprise adds single-axis trackers, PVsyst export and an API. String lengths are set from site temperatures, and single-line diagrams export to CAD.
- Best for: C&I engineering teams that deliver a lender file and drawings.
- Watch for: its pages list no CRM or website lead capture; IRR and LCOE start on Pro.
- UK and South Africa: rates are set up in its Utility Rate Editor rather than pre-configured.
- Full comparison: HelioScope vs solarVis
Solargraf
Enphase's design, proposal and permitting platform. It detects rooflines, obstructions and trees automatically, produces permit-ready single- and three-line diagrams, supports flat-roof and ground-mount commercial designs, and generates AHJ-ready permit packages in the US. In September 2025 NREL validated its production estimates against measured PV data, with accuracy comparable to NREL's own System Advisor Model. It reports 3 million+ proposals, 1 million+ permits and 1,000+ customers, in 16 languages.
- Best for: installers built around Enphase hardware who want permits generated.
- Watch for: financing integrations are US third-party-ownership providers; no trial is listed.
- UK and South Africa: neither is among its listed markets (US, Canada, Brazil, Germany, Austria, the Netherlands, Japan).
Solar Monkey
A Dutch platform trusted, by its own count, by more than 500 installation companies in the Netherlands, Belgium, Germany, Spain and the UK (since August 2023). It models roofs from aerial photos and a 3D elevation model, detects shade per panel, checks string plans against manufacturer specifications, and compares battery scenarios. Proposals are templated with digital signing, and it integrates with Pipedrive, Salesforce, Zoho and Odoo.
- Best for: residential installers who want fast quotes inside an existing CRM.
- Watch for: single-line diagrams and commercial projects are not listed.
- UK and South Africa: active in the UK, with no MCS documents listed; no South African presence is listed.
solarVis
An all-in-one sales and design platform with an engineering-grade engine. AI Roof Detection returns the roof outline and Fit to LiDAR sets height and slope where high-resolution data covers the address; the 3D design models stepped roofs, with adjoining sections at their own height and roof type, and several buildings in one project, up to 50 MW in a single design. AI panel placement fills each roof to a target, Automatic Stringing checks every MPPT, and the single-line diagram is generated from those strings, checked electrically as you draw and exported as a PDF on your own title block or as a DXF. Feasibility runs PV, battery and heat pump together on a cell-level, 8760-hour engine with tariff rules for 45+ countries; 26 configurable proposal pages go out by email, SMS, link or WhatsApp with view tracking; and the CRM tracks every project to installation.
- Best for: installers and EPCs that want design, engineering, proposal and pipeline in one product, selling PV, batteries and heat pumps from homes to large commercial sites.
- Watch for: no integrated financing, no permit packages, no native mobile app, no lender designation, no trackers; diagrams are single-line only.
- UK and South Africa: MCS documents and Smart Export Guarantee modelling in the UK; around 180 Eskom and municipal tariffs and battery autonomy in South Africa.
- More: Solar Proposal Software and Solar 3D Design & Simulation
Commercial and industrial projects: what changes
A commercial roof is not a house with more panels. Four things change, and they separate the tools faster than any feature list.
- The site, not the roof. A logistics park has several buildings, stepped roofs and plant rooms. Ask whether all of it fits in one project, and whether a lower extension can sit at its own height and roof type.
- Flat-roof layout. South-facing tilted rows or paired east-west tables, with service corridors and wind edge zones kept clear, decide how much capacity the roof really holds.
- Capacity per design. Few vendors publish a ceiling. HelioScope's tiers stop at 1.25, 5 and 30 MW DC; solarVis takes projects up to 50 MW in a single design. For the others, ask.
- Who signs off the yield. A commercial buyer's bank may want a validated production estimate and single-line diagrams. HelioScope holds a lender designation and Solargraf an NREL validation; if your lender names a tool, produce the lender file there.
Tariffs matter more here than on a home: demand charges and time-of-use schedules can swing a C&I payback by years, so check that they are modelled, not averaged. See also: commercial solar, solar trackers, HelioScope vs solarVis.
Selling in the UK and South Africa
United Kingdom. A domestic sale needs an MCS performance estimate and MCS shade assessment, the customer's Smart Export Guarantee rate (set by each supplier, not nationally), the right VAT treatment and, before connection, a DNO notification or application under G98 or G99. Ask which of those the tool produces and which stay with you. Of the seven tools here, Aurora Solar, OpenSolar and solarVis list MCS documents; solarVis models the Smart Export Guarantee as net billing, with default export rates you edit per project to match the customer's supplier. None lists DNO applications.
South Africa. Tariffs depend on the address: some customers are billed by Eskom directly, others by their municipality, often on time-of-use. Grid-tied systems need SSEG registration under municipal frameworks that follow NERSA guidance, and years of load shedding have made backup autonomy the first question a customer asks. Ask whether the tool knows your municipality's tariff, models a battery for autonomy as well as savings, and designs off-grid or zero-injection systems. SolarVis preloads around 180 Eskom and municipal tariffs with seasonal time-of-use and lets you build a custom tariff where a municipality is missing. None of the seven lists load-shedding schedule simulation, and none files SSEG registrations.
See also: UK tariffs and regulations, South Africa tariffs and regulations, time-of-use tariffs, net billing.
How we compared
We make solarVis, so this page is written to be checked. Every tool is compared on the same seven questions and the same matrix rows. Competitor facts come only from each vendor's own website, product pages, help centre and press releases, never from review sites run by a competitor; solarVis facts come from the product itself. Where a vendor's pages say nothing about a capability, the matrix says "Not listed" rather than "No". Each vendor is re-checked at least every 90 days, and prices are not compared on this page.
See also
- Aurora Solar vs solarVis: European coverage vs the US premium leader
- OpenSolar vs solarVis: what the free model does not cover
- Reonic vs solarVis: a free trial vs a demo-first model
- HelioScope vs solarVis: commercial engineering vs the full sale
- What is solar design software?: the category, explained
- Solar CRM: why the pipeline belongs next to the design